M&Ms announced Monday that it would be taking "an indefinite pause from the spokescandies."
The spokescandies are being replaced by actress Maya Rudolph.
Conservatives have criticized the brand's rebranded female M&M candies, dubbing them "less sexy."
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 52 | February 13, 2023 12:10 PM |
Why the hell did they mess with her boots? Did Nancy Sinatra threaten to sue?
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 1 | January 23, 2023 10:10 PM |
Is this even serious? Pathetic!
by Anonymous | reply 2 | January 23, 2023 10:11 PM |
Chalk up another one to the GOP cancel culture.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 3 | January 23, 2023 10:28 PM |
Purple M&M, we hardly knew ye.
by Anonymous | reply 4 | January 23, 2023 10:32 PM |
Imagine if they had introduced a non-binary M&M. Tucker’s head would have exploded.
by Anonymous | reply 5 | January 23, 2023 10:33 PM |
Anybody know what Carlson made issue of? This sounds like one of the most stupid situations I have ever heard of.
by Anonymous | reply 6 | January 23, 2023 10:33 PM |
They changed the heels on the female M&Ms to more practical, less sexy shoes.
by Anonymous | reply 7 | January 23, 2023 10:35 PM |
[quote]Anybody know what Carlson made issue of?
Carlson the Fox "News" crew, if you can stomach it:
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 8 | January 23, 2023 10:40 PM |
If Maya Rudolph is "beloved" I'm Marie of Romania.
by Anonymous | reply 9 | January 23, 2023 10:55 PM |
[quote]They changed the heels on the female M&Ms to more practical, less sexy shoes.
Thanks R7 & R8. What a stink over nothing. Like the "War on Christmas". Doesn't exist.
by Anonymous | reply 11 | January 23, 2023 10:59 PM |
Even if it was somehow implied, I NEVER noticed a gender on any of the M&M's.
by Anonymous | reply 12 | January 23, 2023 11:08 PM |
The whole idea of the green M&M was based on the urban legend tot the green ones make you horny. Not sassy, not empowered, not supporting of other women. Horny.
by Anonymous | reply 13 | January 23, 2023 11:24 PM |
I couldn’t jerk off to the sexy green M&M anymore. Okay? 😡. Leave her the fuck alone!!!
I NEED THE BOOTS!!!
by Anonymous | reply 14 | January 23, 2023 11:31 PM |
This is actually a real story? We’re doomed.
by Anonymous | reply 15 | January 24, 2023 9:07 AM |
Notwithstanding the absolute ridiculousness of this story, it does reinforce just how much has been ruined by Rupert fucking Murdoch.
by Anonymous | reply 16 | January 24, 2023 9:16 AM |
I know R15. Dead in the water.
And 1 million per cent spot on R16. Irreparable now.
by Anonymous | reply 17 | January 24, 2023 9:18 AM |
It's my look now, bitches
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 19 | January 24, 2023 9:24 AM |
Republicans' divisive 'Theming' everything, really is exhausting.
by Anonymous | reply 20 | January 24, 2023 9:32 AM |
Republicans fight the culture wars over the stupidest shit. Someone please answer this question off the topic. Katherine Clark has a trans MTF child.. But she refers to her as non binary but also her daughter. Can you be trans and non binary? This is confusing. I know it has nothing to do with M&Ms.
by Anonymous | reply 21 | January 24, 2023 11:01 AM |
[quote]Can you be trans and non binary?
Looking for logic in the current gender landscape is a fool's errand.
by Anonymous | reply 22 | January 24, 2023 12:14 PM |
R19 The true reason! It was my immediate thought too! MAGAs are angry about the Pink Floyd rainbow and gas stoves as well. Such vital issues
by Anonymous | reply 23 | January 24, 2023 12:22 PM |
Am I having deja vu or didn't that rat faced creep have an issue with the "less sexy" before?
by Anonymous | reply 24 | January 24, 2023 1:20 PM |
The asteroid can't hit us fast enough.
by Anonymous | reply 25 | January 24, 2023 1:23 PM |
Maya Rudolph?
I should have preferred another Maya.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 26 | January 24, 2023 1:47 PM |
The Repugs sexualize everything because they’re all perverts
by Anonymous | reply 27 | January 24, 2023 1:49 PM |
So this was all a joke, right?
by Anonymous | reply 28 | February 1, 2023 1:57 AM |
I haven't been following this story, but based on the photo in the OP, the blue M&M is a horny pervert and the green one is a slut.
by Anonymous | reply 30 | February 1, 2023 1:59 AM |
Sorry R29 but you’ve been had. There’s no way this shit is for real. It’s clearly some sort of M&M marketing ploy.
by Anonymous | reply 31 | February 1, 2023 2:08 AM |
I guess this means there is no hope for an M&M in cha cha heels.
by Anonymous | reply 32 | February 1, 2023 2:17 AM |
THIS is why we can't have any nice things.
by Anonymous | reply 34 | February 11, 2023 4:17 AM |
[quote] Is this even serious? Pathetic!
American Corporations are pathetic.
by Anonymous | reply 35 | February 11, 2023 4:23 AM |
who the fuck is Maya Rude-off!
by Anonymous | reply 36 | February 11, 2023 4:31 AM |
Yes, it was only the GOP that was against this. If you had a had a problem with it, then you're a republican. Bros tanked in the ratings because you didn't support it, which makes you a q magat.
and since you're a q magat, we're going to do an about face and cater to your whims because we always bow to our critics from the right.
by Anonymous | reply 39 | February 11, 2023 12:46 PM |
All of this started with M&M carving to the left's insistence that gender stereotypes were harmful to all the trans/non-binary youths, especially with the hyper feminized brown & green M&Ms. At the time they released a statement to the press pronouncing their commitment to inclusivity & to deconstructing social stereotypes of especially women. So claiming that this is resultant of the right's culture wars ia just evidence of how Fox isn't the only outlet filling their viewers minds with spun bullshit.
M&M gave in to the biggest mouths on social media, from the left, and screwed with legacy branding that consumers across every persuasion recognized & appreciated. Loyal consumers had every reasonable right to object to the change & the company suffered for messing with a concept that needed no messing with. Most people understandably, regardless of political affiliation, don't understand or even care about this current contradictory & scattered gender platform, so to inject it into beloved cartoony branding was plain ignorant. The company deserved all the backlash for being so righteous for what it apparently doesn't understand & frankly for being so weak when it came to a few bullies.
by Anonymous | reply 41 | February 11, 2023 1:19 PM |
Oh give it up, r41. You've been trolling all morning about trans Trans TRANS and we're sick of it, we're sick of you, and sick of your Fox News talking points.
Besides, we'll almost certainly find out tomorrow during the M&M Super Bowl commercial that the spokescandies are still around.
by Anonymous | reply 42 | February 11, 2023 1:23 PM |
Your delusion is hilarious R42, really. I haven't posted in days & it wasn't about anything trans when I did. But since you've got who I am figured out you probably knew that. Stop cutting your pills in half, take the whole thing.
by Anonymous | reply 43 | February 11, 2023 1:34 PM |
It's just candy. To be offered by boots it's ridiculous, but trying to fix what isn't broken in order to be "woke" in such a divided society it was a stupid move.
R9 the reason they pick Maya is the same why she was in SNL even when she wasn't that funny. She can play white and black, that why they said "we can all agree" on her.
by Anonymous | reply 44 | February 11, 2023 1:35 PM |
Stop it. This is all a sham. It’s not real.
by Anonymous | reply 45 | February 12, 2023 1:13 AM |
R45, exactly. It’s a PR stunt leading up to Super Bowl commercial BS. Yawn.
by Anonymous | reply 46 | February 12, 2023 1:36 AM |
Is today the day we see it was a sham?
by Anonymous | reply 47 | February 12, 2023 7:03 PM |
[quote]R46: It’s a PR stunt leading up to Super Bowl commercial BS. Yawn.
So, R46, did that happen?
by Anonymous | reply 48 | February 13, 2023 7:50 AM |
I forgot all about this but yeah, apparently the spokescandies were never actually gone.
Offsite Linkby Anonymous | reply 50 | February 13, 2023 10:05 AM |
Will someone get Maya Rudolph out of these caftans and gigantic dresses. She's not Cass Elliot, ffs.
by Anonymous | reply 51 | February 13, 2023 10:20 AM |
Is this about all the lead that's in chocolate and M&M is hoping we're going to forget?
by Anonymous | reply 52 | February 13, 2023 12:10 PM |
ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7pa3TmqOorZ6csm%2BvzqZmraCimq6le5Jram5tY2h%2FbrmMpmSsZaOWxrR5yK1krGWbnrmttc2gZKKso2LAsbvKnqqcmZ6Ztqa%2FjJqdrZ2iYrCwutKeqa%2BZpJ7Dpr%2BMsJyrnV2kwrW%2BwKCcnWWkna61edOhnGafopqyr3nOp5xmnJmZu27AjLCcmqpdnLxus85mmainpKh6orrYpqarnQ%3D%3D